![]() As for those who are not fans, they pay attention to celebrities and the released news to escape from boredom. Scholar Kinta Hung suggests that the "dual entertainment path model" shows that fans and non-fans use different ways to engage with their favourite celebrities. Some attested that they would not take any photo of celebrity children without consent." Scholar Andrew Mendelson has argued that "Paparazzi are valuable in that they reveal potential mismatches between the public image and the reality of celebrities who possess great power in contemporary society, which legitimizes the paparazzi's invasion of celebrity privacy as a form of watchdog journalism." Īnne Jerslev and Mette Mendelson have noted that the paparazzi have become integrated into mainstream culture, and their photographs are distributed widely and quickly by consumers. In a series of paparazzi interviews, most participants claimed they would not break the law. ![]() Ray Murray argues that "some paparazzi will draw an ethical line" by following specific rules. On the other hand, scholar Elizabeth Hindman claims that the sale of exaggerated content without context to sensationalize particular moments has decreased credibility in the news industry. The death of Diana, Princess of Wales, has been cited as an example of the risks of paparazzi techniques. The method of stalking is harmful according to past events, as it has led to injury or death of the star. Intrusion by paparazzi and fans Paparazzi Diana, Princess of WalesĬelebrities' pictures are taken and sold to the press for financial purposes by freelance photographers known by the term " paparazzi." Some techniques which the term paparazzi use include stalking, which could cause turbulence to the lives of celebrities if approached aggressively. Scholar Seong Hong has stated Lee's privacy right was not protected because of her celebrity identity. Lee has sued Internet Entertainment Group (IEG) and Paramount for broadcasting a story in 1998 that contained excerpts from the tape however, the court considered her voluntarily sacrificing her privacy in hopes of publicizing herself. Jamie Nordhaus says, "The boundaries of privacy and publicity for celebrities can become blurred, as they most are always watched by fans, paparazzi, and other potential stalkers." It has been suggested that celebrities "remain conscious of maintaining a public persona when they are in the public eye as opposed to a personal one in private" and "negotiate with the press to release staged private life photos." Jens Heffman argues that 'Celebrity attempts to sacrifice their privacy for publicity may result in a loss of legal protections, as celebrities claiming that an invasion of privacy by the press could be seen as using media to achieve or maintain fame.' The latter argument was used in a court decision on a stolen sex tape that featured American actress Pamela Anderson Lee and her then-boyfriend Bret Michaels. This invasion of privacy causes their private lives to be governed by the public. Celebrity privacy as a controlled publicity Ĭelebrities are often controlled by the public exposure they receive and the need to maintain positive professional images. Commonly posed arguments center upon topics such as the idea of celebrity privacy as controlled publicity, the intrusion of paparazzi or fans, and what types of privacy should be granted to and expected by children of celebrities. Scholars have debated how much or what type of privacy celebrities and their friends or family can or should expect. Debate Surrounding the Celebrity Privacy The legal impact of these celebrity privacy laws has currently been undetermined since the curb for celebrity privacy intrusion often counteracts the legal principle of " free press" in many countries. Some national and state governments set up privacy laws mainly to protect celebrity privacy and their family members. In addition, Paparazzi make commercial use of their private data. Different from the privacy of the general public, 'Celebrity Privacy' is considered as "controlled publicity," challenged by the press and the fans. ![]() This term often pertains explicitly to personal information, which includes addresses and family members, among other data for personal identification. ( November 2018) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message)Ĭelebrity privacy refers to the right of celebrities and public figures, largely entertainers, athletes or politicians, to withhold the information they are unwilling to disclose. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |